[ Diretor: Mário Frota [ Coordenador Editorial: José Carlos Fernandes Pereira [ Fundado em 30-11-1999 [ Edição III [ Ano XII

sexta-feira, 19 de maio de 2017

The evidence behind a 40% energy efficiency target

DISCLAIMER: All opinions in this column reflect the views of the author(s), not of EURACTIV.com PLC.
Compact fluorescent lamps being tested at the Lighting and Appliance Testing Laboratory, Philippines.
[Asian Development Bank/Flickr]

Yamina Saheb is senior energy policy analyst at OpenExp, a Paris-based global network of independent experts working on solutions for sustainable development.

The Commission’s November 2016 clean energy package is going through a gruelling approval process where practically every comma is being challenged. Yet, this approval process is ignoring (or unaware of) some important evidence.

The Commission’s “impact assessment” related to the proposed changes to the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) includes five scenarios with efficiency ambition going from 27% (EUCO27) to 40% (EUCO+40) energy savings. The impact of the Commission’s scenarios on EU competitiveness has been estimated in terms of their impact on 1) EU industry, especially the energy intensive ones, 2) international fuel prices and, iii) balance of trade.

Contrary to common belief, ambitious energy savings scenarios are not expected to adversely impact the competitiveness of EU industry. In fact, energy-intensive industries are not targeted by efficiency measures as they are already regulated under the EU emissions trading scheme (EU-ETS).


Sem comentários: